Showing posts with label CAR REVIEWS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CAR REVIEWS. Show all posts

Drop-Top Dreams, Part Four: Pair of Porsches

6/18/2012

2013 Porsche Boxster and 2012 Porsche 911 Cabriolet
It's hard to believe that it's been 15 years since the original Porsche Boxster bowed, but as Ferry himself was fond of saying, “Die Zeit vergeht, wenn man Spaß!” (“Time flies when you're having fun!”)

This third-generation Boxster retains its lovely mid- engine proportions while boasting some nifty new design cues.

For one, we love the integrated spoiler out back, running straight across the rear deck and through the taillight lenses. The windshield, even more steeply raked than before, gives the Boxster a cool going-fast-while-standing-still look.

Though the base Boxster engine gets downsized from 2.9 liters to 2.7, it amazingly turns out more power than before, at 265 hp. The Boxster S retains its 3.4-liter flat-six, rated at 315 hp, and either engine can be fitted with a standard six-speed manual or an optional PDK seven-speed dual-clutch gearbox borrowed from the 911.

While the car has grown in almost all directions—stretching 1.1 inches longer than the previous car and sitting on a wheelbase that is 2.4 inches longer—from a sunshine standpoint, it means the top is even bigger, too, reaching further back toward the rear wheels while incorporating a larger backlight. Thankfully, those clever Porsche engineers managed to reduce the Boxster's heft at the curb by up to 77 pounds, despite the car's growth spurt.

Like its big brother, the 911 cabrio, the Boxster top gets an elegantly tonneau-coverless treatment, the whole assembly folding like an accordion onto itself while still presenting a perfectly polished finished look. And opening and closing the top is now a fully automated affair. Press the center-console-mounted rocker switch, and the magnesium-framed top deploys or folds in just nine seconds, at speeds up to 31 mph.

Despite the bigger glass, however, rearward visibility suffers more than before, not only because the rear decklid sits higher than the previous car's, but also because the rollover hoops are now fixed in place. And the effect is worse when the top is up.
Our easy solution? Keep the top stashed.

2013 Porsche Boxster


ON SALE: Summer
BASE PRICE: $50,450
DRIVETRAIN: 2.7-liter, 265-hp, 206-lb-ft H6; RWD, six-speed manual
CURB WEIGHT: 2,888 lb
0-60 MPH: 5.5 sec (mfr)
FUEL ECONOMY (EPA): 29 mpg (est)

2012 Porsche 911 Cabriolet

This is without a doubt the best soft-top in automotive history. To save weight, Porsche purposely did not go with a hardtop, but this one is as close to a hardtop as you'll get, with lower frame parts made of aluminum and three flat cloth-wrapped magnesium panels swaddled in insulation and then skinned with a headliner. Hit a button, and in 13 seconds, the roof is down and you are cruising, the top nestled in the famous Z-fold behind the passenger compartment. Bonus: The top can be operated at speeds up to 31 mph. No need to pull over if you're surprised by a gully washer! A wind buffer also deploys at the press of a button and then stows automatically. Top up, it's quiet as a clamshell. Top down, there is minimal or almost no buffeting but all the sunshine you can handle. As for the rest of the car, powertrain choices carry over from the coupe, with base Carrera cabrios getting the 350-hp 3.4-liter boxer-six, while Carrera S models get the 400-hp 3.8-liter engine. Shifting duties fall to either a seven-speed manual or seven-speed PDK dual-clutch box. With the top up, the 911's profile comes this close to matching that of the coupe. It even cuts through the air as smoothly, with a remarkable 0.30 Cd. Inside, that translates to two decibels less noise than in the old car. The cabrio also gets all the same bits that suspend the coupe. Specific to the cabriolet are a reinforced windshield frame, doorsills and B-pillars, resulting in a body that is torsionally 18 percent stiffer than the previous model while weighing 132 pounds lighter

Gallery :





7 performance cars less than $30,000, part four: Subaru BRZ

6/17/2012

The game changer for sportscars
If Mazda produced a coupe version of the MX-5 Miata, we'd imagine it being similar to what Subaru has created with the BRZ. The two cars share the a philosophy based on rear-wheel drive, low weight and affordability—an ethos that has helped the little Mazda thrill drop-top enthusiasts and club racers for more than two decades. Expect the BRZ (and its Scion FR-S cousin) to follow a similar path and become a staple at road courses all over America.

Why? Because after two days of track testing, Autoweek editors walked away in agreement that the Subaru was the most driver-focused car of the seven-car bunch. The feedback and response through the steering wheel, tight chassis and sensational fade-free brakes entertained us lap after lap. 

The 2.0-liter boxer four-cylinder uses port and direct injection to produce 200 hp. Unfortunately, Subaru could only provide an automatic model for our test. On the plus side, the auto offers a decent paddle-shift mode with rev-matching for downshifts. And in speed tests, it helped return a respectable 7.21 seconds to 60 mph and covered the quarter-mile in 15.65 seconds.

Where the engine shines is at the top end of the rev range. Staying in the power is easier with the six-speed manual that we've experienced on previous drives of the BRZ, making the auto box maddening at times. We definitely recommend the three-pedal BRZ if you're shopping one.

Is more power needed? No. Would it be welcome? Absolutely. But when a car is designed from the start to have a low curb weight and a low center of gravity like the BRZ, having adequate power is all you need to make it fun. 

Through the track's winding infield, cranking the well-weighted steering wheel loaded up the suspension, and the BRZ held a tight line. Changing directions happened quickly, with little body roll. If you want to kick the rear out, turn off all of traction aids and goose the throttle. There's enough grunt to rotate the back around.

The package is completed with a simple cabin, supportive seats and a comfortable driving position. And for weekend racers, Subaru says there's room to haul a set of wheels and a small toolbox with the rear seats folded down to give the coupe a practicality argument.

Simply put, the BRZ is the affordable, fun-to-drive, rear-wheel-drive sports coupe that's been missing from the market for so long. With only 6,000 coming to the United States during the first year, we predict demand easily eclipsing supply.

2013 Subaru BRZ Limited


BASE PRICE: $28,270
DRIVETRAIN: 2.0-liter, 200-hp, 151-lb-ft H4; RWD, six-speed automatic
CURB WEIGHT: 2,822 lb
0-60 MPH: 7.21 sec (AW)
QUARTER-MILE: 15.65 sec (AW)
60-0 MPH: 126.58 ft (AW)
FUEL ECONOMY (EPA/AW): 28/25 mpg

Gallery :






 

7 performance cars for less than $30,000, part one: Fiat 500 Abarth vs. Mini Cooper S coupe

6/13/2012

The Fiat 500 Abarth takes on the Mini Cooper S coupe
While the idea of having a Ferrari 458 Italia or a McLaren MP4-12C in the garage would thrill any car guy or gal, the reality is that a $200,000-plus supercar isn't affordable for most people. Even performance players such as the BMW M3, the Cadillac CTS-V and the Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG are out of reach for many. With that in mind, we set a maximum base price of $30,000 to see what the state of the affordable performance car is today. From there we selected seven of the latest entries —ranging from a couple of cute turbocharged featherweights to a pair of potent rear-wheel-drive coupes punching in at more than 300 hp. After putting each car through instrument testing and tossing them around the infield road course at Michigan International Speedway in Brooklyn, Mich., we can confidently say that there's plenty of fun to be had without having to remortgage the house. 

The Fashionably Quick

With looks that most people will either love or hate, the Fiat 500 Abarth and the Mini Cooper S coupe lead the cutesy performance-car charge.

Both Mini and Fiat strapped a turbocharger onto their four-cylinder engines to boost output, to 181 hp for the S coupe and to 160 hp in the Abarth. The Mini steps in at 177 lb-ft of torque (192 lb-ft with overboost), while the Fiat makes 170 lb-ft. Both send the power to the front wheels through a manual transmission, a six-speed for the Mini and a five-speed on the Abarth.

Fiat improved the 500's handling by lowering the chassis 0.6 inch, adding Koni FSD shocks and strapping on a rear antiroll bar. Mini, on the other hand, didn't worry about improving handling, instead lifting the S coupe's suspension and chassis from the existing Mini Roadster on which it's based. It then replaced the convertible roof with a hardtop, creating the stiffest, best-handling Mini on the market.

On the track, the Mini's stiffness, go-kart-like handling and additional 20 hp easily outclassed the Abarth by the tune of five seconds per lap. Apexes were hit with ease, and the Autoweek-installed bus-stop chicane was a breeze for the Mini. Whether in the curves or on the straights, the S coupe pulled away from the Abarth.

However, the Abarth closed the gap in the braking zones thanks to its big Brembos. Behind the wheel of the Fiat, we were able to brake deeper into turn one at MIS—the fastest part of the track— than in the Mini. But it was not enough to stick with the S coupe.

The Abarth is still a major improvement from the base Fiat 500, which only has 101 hp and 98 lb-ft of torque. The Abarth goes from 0 to 60 mph in 7.5 seconds, handling is outstanding when up against the standard 500, and the dual exhaust creates a loud, sporty sound.

The Abarth and the Mini held up well during the brutal two-day test. Each car was put through countless laps and slalom runs, skidpad trials and acceleration and braking tests. Both the brakes and tires on each car were ready for another couple days of heavy work by the time the test was over.

The two cars were also calm to drive at speed, with tight steering, good responsiveness and solid feel around the road course. The comfortable, supportive seats and a driver-friendly interior layout add to the sporty feel of each car.

Overall, both the Mini and the Fiat are solid, cute, compact sports cars. Each is a blast to throw around a track, but when it comes to overall performance, the S coupe takes the cake.

2012 Fiat 500 Abarth




BASE PRICE: $22,700
DRIVETRAIN: 1.4-liter, 160-hp, 170-lb-ft turbocharged I4; FWD, five-speed manual
CURB WEIGHT: 2,512 lb
0-60 MPH: 7.32 sec (AW)
QUARTER-MILE: 15.94 sec (AW)
60-0 MPH: 137.32 ft (AW)
FUEL ECONOMY (EPA/AW): 31/21.7 mpg

2012 Mini Cooper S Coupe


BASE PRICE: $25,300
DRIVETRAIN: 1.6-liter, 181-hp, 177-lb-ft (192 lb-ft with overboost) turbocharged I4; FWD, six-speed manual
CURB WEIGHT: 2,679 lb
0-60 MPH: 7.16 sec (AW)
QUARTER-MILE: 15.67 sec (AW)
60-0 MPH: 125.83 ft (AW)
FUEL ECONOMY (EPA/AW): 30/23.6 mpg

Gallery:









2012 Ford Flex SEL: Review notes

6/12/2012

Wishing for a turbodiesel in this stylish people mover
A front view of the 2012 Ford Flex..
EXECUTIVE EDITOR BOB GRITZINGER: With the completely redesigned Explorer on the market, the Flex may be the biggest redundancy in Ford's lineup. The Flex offers a slightly longer wheelbase and a little more overall passenger room, but the Explorer boasts a slightly higher towing capacity. The Flex offers an optional turbo V6, while the Explorer sticks with the naturally aspirated V6 or a turbo four (at least for now). But in reality, the Flex and the Explorer now seem like two different styling takes on the same six- or seven-seat front- or all-wheel-drive SUV. If Ford can afford to make and market both models, more power to it. But other than looks, there's not a lot to distinguish between the pair.

That's not to say that there's anything particularly wrong with the Flex as a fairly large, smooth-cruising utility vehicle, with a surprisingly responsive and high-revving engine. The low-riding suspension allows easy access, and interior comfort is good and highly adjustable. Driving is easy-unlike the Explorer, the Flex drives smaller than it is. A real topper for me would be to offer a sliding door option, truly making it a "flex" vehicle for those who want the ute look but would like the practicality of a minivan slider. That would make the Flex something special.

What's wrong with the car? Trying to use the voice-command Sync and MyFord Touch functions to control audio and other systems is maddening. I eventually settled on three radio stations on three bands that I could reasonably cycle among using voice commands, but touching a button would've been considerably easier. Put it this way: If voice commands are so good, why not use them to adjust seats and mirrors, or start and stop the engine, or lock the doors, or put the vehicle in gear, or steer or control various other on-board systems.

Why not? Because multilevel voice commands are the hardest way to get from point A to point B. And even when the system does respond accurately, it's so slow that I found myself overriding commands because I thought it was not responding. It was a lot like hitting the "Enter" key or clicking the mouse when the computer is running slow. It's hard to work with that in the fast-moving automotive environment.

SENIOR ART DIRECTOR CHERYL L. BLAHNIK: The Flex's retro looks hook me immediately, along with the contrasting white top. It's long and the design flows nicely along with its low ride height, which seems fitting.

The interior is sleek and clean with plenty of room even for passengers riding in the third row. The Flex is a large vehicle but drives smaller than it is, with good power from the V6.

As for why Ford is still keeping the Flex around now that the Explorer is here, well, there are some people who don't need that much towing capacity and prefer to have a stylish ride. If given the choice, I would take a Flex over the Explorer for its visual flair that isn't too common on the roads today.

EXECUTIVE EDITOR ROGER HART: The Flex is the modern-day family trickster, today's version of the now-departed American station wagon. I loaded this Flex up with six other adults and headed off to Lansing, and the only complaint was that the air conditioning could not keep the folks in the third row cool without giving the front-seat passengers frostbite. A rear A/C option would be welcome, and frankly, with that many people aboard, the V6 in this was anemic. I had to wind it out, loudly, to get up to freeway cruising speed. I could see that the EcoBoost option would be a good choice here if buyers were going to exploit the Flex's hauling capabilities.

From the driver's seat, this is the Ford Taurus with more hauling capacity, or, at least, reconfigured hauling capacity. It drives and rides much like the Taurus, which is to say it's a pretty decent ride. With seven seats filled, the suspension wallowed a bit over dips in the road, but just about everyone commented on what a "nice ride" the car was.

For me, I'd rather drive this than just about any minivan, but if I had to haul six or seven people regularly, a minivan would be a much better choice. The passengers would be much more comfortable, as getting in and out of the third row is a bit of a contortionist's act. But I like the Flex's looks-always have-and even in this "ginger ale" green color and the white roof, this thing has presence. You can't always say that about station wagons.

EDITOR WES RAYNAL: Perhaps the best thing about this Flex is the interior, which I found well built, nicely designed and comfortable. I won't get into the nightmare that is Sync or MyFord Touch; that's all been well documented for the hell that it is. Overall, though, I maintain that the interior is quite nice and way roomy, and it feels far more expensive than that found on a $37,000 vehicle.

When I saw the Flex listed on the car board I was hoping for the EcoBoost, but this is a normally aspirated V6. It's not slow exactly, and the engine is nice and quiet while cruising. But the car feels labored under acceleration, and that the car weighs nearly 4,500 pounds is quite evident when you boot it. I like the EcoBoost versions a lot better. The chassis offers decent steering and the ride is fairly tight for the weight. But it can get a little rolly when you push it, which only begs the question-why are you pushing it in the first place?

Overall, I've always liked the Flex, finding it unique among crossovers and well built. Again, I'd like this one a lot better with the turbo six-cylinder.

DIGITAL EDITOR ANDREW STOY: Turbo six, Raynal? Meh. Give me a turbodiesel six and we can talk, because that's exactly the kind of powertrain a big people mover such as this needs: tons of torque and highway fuel efficiency that could probably hit mid-30s.

That's a pipe dream, of course, and for me the 2012 Ford Flex SEL did just fine with its naturally aspirated 3.5-liter V6. It's a station wagon, after all, and not one with any performance intentions, stated or otherwise.

Personally, I love it. The Flex has been around for a few years now, and I still think it's one of the nicest packages on the market. As noted earlier, it drives smaller than it is, blending smooth, quiet freeway cruising with a surprising amount of agility for what's essentially a low-riding Explorer.

Interior space is what it's all about, though, and the Flex is huge. If it had a removable third-row option, the rear cargo area would be minivan-size, but as it stands, there's a good blend of utility and passenger room. I turned to look back at one of the kids while we were at a stoplight and I had to pause for a moment as I realized how far away from me they were sitting.

Our tester also had Ford's new inflatable rear seatbelts, a curiosity as we learned to maneuver them through the various clips and buckles on the kids' booster seats. They're bulky at first, but once latched with a child in the proper position they fit perfectly and actually seem to integrate with the booster even better than a standard belt.

Still, the Flex has the one flaw with which nearly all current Ford vehicles are saddled. No, not MyFord Touch, which I can figure out; it's the steep MSRP. Chances are you can find incentives on a Flex, but you'll still need to be prepared to spend in the upper-$30,000 range for one with a decent level of equipment. Let Wes Raynal talk you into an EcoBoost Flex, and you're looking at a sticker uncomfortably close to $50,000. No wonder we don't see too many around.

2012 Ford Flex SEL
 
Base Price: $34,050

As-Tested Price: $37,610

Drivetrain: 3.5-liter V6; FWD, six-speed automatic

Output: 287 hp @ 6,500 rpm, 254 lb-ft @ 4,000 rpm

Curb Weight: 4,471 lb

Fuel Economy (EPA/AW): 20/20.9 mpg

Options: Equipment group 202A, including power liftgate, body-color liftgate appliqué, rearview camera, 110-volt inverter, leather-trimmed seats, blind-spot monitoring with cross-traffic alert and remote start; voice-activated navigation system ($795); rear inflatable seatbelts ($195); white two-tone roof ($395)

Gallery :



 

Drop-Top Dreams, Part Three: 2013 Bentley Continental GTC V8

6/09/2012

With the top down, buffeting is seldom an issue for those in the GTC's front seats. Put the side windows up, and you probably won't bother with the removable rear wind blocker that stows in the trunk.
The new 500-hp Bentley Continental GTC V8 will arrive this fall, a bit late for the summer driving season, but there's always the more familiar 567-hp V12. Either way, the Continental GTC brings a fabulous combination of high style, unmistakable presence, good response and smooth, stable velocity that no convertible matches.
Let's face it: The best convertible in the world will never be as buttoned-down or as rigid as its fixed-roof counterpart. Bentley brags that this is the world's stiffest convertible with “coupelike refinement,” and that may be true. But with the top up, there's still a bit more road noise and wind noise in the GTC than in the GT coupe. There's also an extra bit of rippling flex through the steering column when you pound over a railroad crossing. Such is the price for open-top motoring.
If you choose to drive your convertible into the winter, the Continental GTC doesn't have all of the high-tech climate-management gizmos. The top is crafted with traditional fabric over a seven-bow frame, heavily insulated and lined with Alcantara. It's exceptionally taut when it's closed and clean in profile. It operates with one button at speeds up to 20 mph, opening or closing in about 25 seconds.
With the top down, buffeting is seldom an issue for those in the GTC's front seats. Put the side windows up, and you probably won't bother with the removable rear wind blocker that stows in the trunk. There's little turbulence holding steady at 80 mph. The neck warmers—small, forced-air vents between the seatback and the headrest—work well but lose effectiveness quickly with distance. If it's really cold, GTC occupants will have to keep heads pressed to the headrests to benefit.
The GTC's all-wheel-drive system helps in foul weather, too—or on a racetrack. It's amazing how this 2.5-ton machine and its massive tires react to a skillful throttle foot. With its traction electronics off, the GTC V8 will take a set, balance and drift opposite-lock through fast corners, tail hanging. And it will consume miles at triple-digit speeds like a magic carpet. Inside, the GTC is all padded, soft leather surfaces, with big, comfortable seats and a hand-finished, bespoke quality that lesser luxury brands don't match.
The GTC V8 is a tad lighter than the V12, slightly sharper, maybe more youthful, and it's substantially more efficient, measured by energy consumption. If you seek the ultimate in conspicuously comfortable, effortlessly rapid top-down motoring, either Continental GTC will do perfectly.

2013 Bentley Continental GTC V8

ON SALE: September
BASE PRICE: $190,000 (est)
DRIVETRAIN: 4.0-liter, 500-hp, 487-lb-ft turbocharged V8; AWD, eight-speed automatic
WEIGHT: 5,445 lb
0-60 MPH: 4.7 sec (mfr)
FUEL ECONOMY (EPA): 21 mpg (est)

Drop-Top Dreams, Part Two: 2013 Ferrari California

The California loses weight, gains muscle and still packs a punch
“Bellissima,” said an approaching road cyclist during a break in our drive of the updated 2013 Ferrari California through the hills outside of Maranello, Italy. The friendly Italian came to stop next to the car, beaming while asking questions. Admittedly, our Italian is rusty (OK, nonexistent), causing us to only grin and nod in agreement. After realizing that we had no idea what he was saying, we shook hands, and he continued his uphill climb.

It's funny because, before the encounter, we stood at the side of the road questioning the California's beauty. From the front and side, it's a looker, but you wonder when you get to the bulbous rear. The oversized rear deck is there to conceal the two-piece folding hardtop, and Ferrari didn't even attempt to visually smooth it out for the California's mid-cycle update. In fact, nothing on the exterior changed.

Instead, you'll have to look underneath the California's aluminum skin to discover the new beginning, with the V8 engine now producing 483 hp, up from 453 hp because of a remapped ECU, new pistons and a redesigned exhaust manifold. Torque increases by 15 lb-ft, to 372 lb-ft.

Another change comes when the California rolls onto the scale, slimming down 66 pounds thanks to Ferrari's advancements in aluminum alloys and joining methods allowing for weight loss while maintaining structural rigidity. The chassis now consists of 12 different alloys instead of the previous eight. Thirteen of those lost pounds come from the new aluminum engine cradle, which is stiffer than the previous steel unit.

While the California is meant to be a comfortable GT car in the Ferrari lineup, it has added a Handling Speciale package for drivers who like sharper handling. The $7,227 package has faster ECU logic for the magnetorheological dampers, uprated springs and a quicker steering ratio.

Over the twisty Ferrari development drive route, our Handling Speciale package-equipped California was lively. With the manettino switched to sport for optimal gearshifts, traction-control settings and damping, we stayed busy sawing on the wheel, attacking seemingly endless hairpins. This enabled us to enjoy the communicative and responsive steering and generous grip in turns with little body roll.

The Brembo carbon-ceramic brakes made diving deep into corners possible, with diamond-hard pedal feel. Throw in the imperceptible traction-control system to help effectively put down the power, and you have one of the most surefooted and confident drop-tops available. If it wasn't for the blinking traction light on the dash while powering out of corners, we would have no idea it was there helping us along.

The very slight tradeoff for improved agility from the handling pack is ride comfort. A brief sample of a California road without the handling pack revealed a softer ride, less-responsive steering and more roll through bends.

True to the California's original mission, turn the manettino to comfort, leave the dual-clutch gearbox in automatic and you can cruise docilely around town or through the countryside with ease. Minimal wind buffeting intrudes into the cabin, and conversations with a passenger at regular speeds are not problem with the top stowed.

Almost all of our driving was done with the top down and in sport mode, which also activates a freer-breathing exhaust-valve setting. The V8's instant power, rev-happy nature, riveting exhaust note and our favorite dual-clutch transmission make keeping the engine dancing up near its 8,000-rpm redline satisfying from a performance and aural standpoint.

If you're looking to experience a mechanical symphony, the California is one of the best seats in the house. It all made us forget about the oversized humps out back.

Bellissima, indeed.

2013 Ferrari California


ON SALE: June

BASE PRICE: $201,290

DRIVETRAIN: 4.3-liter, 483-hp, 372-lb-ft V8; RWD, seven-speed dual-clutch sequential manual

CURB WEIGHT: 3,817 lb

0-60 MPH: 3.8 sec (mfr)

FUEL ECONOMY (EPA): 15 mpg

2012 Suzuki Kizashi Sport GTS: Review notes

Struggling for midsize-sedan relevance
EDITOR WES RAYNAL: It cracks me up that this is called the Sport model. It's anything but. The combination of the four-cylinder and the continuously variable transmission just doesn't cut it. Add in all-wheel drive sapping even more power and, well, you get the picture. The fact that the four-cylinder is a bit crude and loud only adds to my distaste for the 2012 Suzuki Kizashi Sport GTS. The shift paddles on the steering wheel seem like some sort of cruel joke. 

It's not bad-looking inside and out. It reminds me a lot of the last-generation Volkswagen Jetta, which was good-looking. The all-wheel drive would make the car a good winter warrior, and I will say that the steering is good, and the ride/handling mix is as well.

But the Kizashi is not really on my radar. Not with the Mazda 3, the Ford Focus, the Chevrolet Cruze, etc. on the market--or at least not on my radar as a new car. Maybe a sub-$20,000 used one. 

COPY EDITOR CYNTHIA L. OROSCO-WRIGHT: This Suzuki brought back fond memories of our long-term Kizashi; I know that I was one of the few in the office who enjoyed zipping around in the car. But, that 'Zashi did not seem as sluggish and as noisy--even with the CVT--as this Sport model did. Wow! I found myself turning up the radio to be able to hear it over the buzzing, especially at higher speeds.

Inside, the interior is pretty basic, which I expected. But the yards of hard plastic lent a lesser-quality look. And the seats lacked bolster. But there was plenty of legroom and shoulder room up front and in the back seats, and the trunk was spacious.

The Kizashi is good around curves and corners and is easy to toss about. And brake pedal feel is solid. This car does handle well; it just needs a better combination to get it moving down the road.

DIGITAL EDITOR ANDREW STOY: I remember when the Kizashi hit the market--it made quite an impact, at least among auto reviewers, being the first modern Suzuki sedan to feel like a real car. Unfortunately, it never made much of an impact among the buying public thanks to a nonexistent marketing campaign and the fact that folks shopping midsize sedans simply don't think to look at a Suzuki dealership.

Outside, Suzuki made an effort to craft something a little different, and the Kizashi stands out to some degree. On the inside, though, it's a generation old already, thanks to hard plastics, an outdated driver interface and chintzy feeling controls. Then there's the smell--is it possible for a car to smell cheap?

But what kills the Kizashi for me is, unsurprisingly, the powertrain. The four-cylinder CVT combo is just plain bad and would be in any car. But it's more noticeable by virtue of the otherwise adequate wrapper in which it's packaged.
Would Suzuki have had a competitive midsize sedan if the Kizashi had a better driveline? Probably not, but you have to wonder what would have happened if, say, the Hyundai Sonata's turbo four and six-speed automatic were under the hood, and a smattering of ads had directed folks to at least take a test drive.
Instead, along with its Grand Vitara stablemate, the Kizashi likely will become one of the last four-wheeled Suzuki products we see on these shores for a while.

SENIOR ART DIRECTOR CHERYL L. BLAHNIK: The Suzuki Kizashi looks good. I've always been a fan of the shapely exhaust outlets and its overall sporty appearance. Like Cynthia, it made me think of our long-term Kizashi. 

It's a shame that this car didn't make a bigger splash with consumers. As Andy noted, the lack of marketing and the company's history of mediocre cars didn't do the Kizashi any favors. However, Suzuki does have some street credentials, but that's for its great motorcycles. There's a Suzuki bike in my garage right now, and I love it. 

As for this Sport model, I do like the small cosmetic upgrades, but I think Suzuki should have attempted to squeeze some more power out of the four-cylinder to go along with the suspension upgrades.

2012 Suzuki Kizashi Sport GTS
 
Base Price: $26,494

As-Tested Price: $27,149

Drivetrain: 2.4-liter I4; AWD, continuously variable transmission

Output: 180 hp @ 6,500 rpm, 170 lb-ft @ 4,000 rpm

Curb Weight: 3,241 lb

Fuel Economy (EPA/AW): 25/24.3 mpg

Options: Bluetooth connectivity ($250); premium floor and cargo mats ($210); premium metallic paint ($130); trunk subfloor organizer with first aid kit ($65)

Gallery :




Drop-top dreams part 1 - 2012 Jaguar XKR-S convertible

6/06/2012

Summer is nearly upon us, and it's time to hit the road. What car better than a convertible in which to take that road trip? Here we offer not a comprehensive list, but rather a collection of the most current top-down models that we think should be on your radar. From Bentleys to Volvos and Ferraris to Minis, with a Lamborghini thrown in, too, what follows is a nice, wide spectrum to get your wind-in-your-hair, sun-on-your-shoulders travel juices flowing. Enjoy!

2012 Jaguar XKR-S convertible


Oftentimes, the removal of a car's top makes the resulting convertible look like some sort of a design experiment, where the lines just don't look right. Not so with the ragtop version of Jaguar's most powerful road-going car, the XKR-S convertible. The car is, in just about every measure, stunning.
The exterior design is about as sexy as cars get today, with beautiful, grace-ful lines accented by purposeful scoops, flares and a carbon-fiber front splitter and rear wing. And what's even better, the XKR-S lives up to how good it looks performance-wise.
The exhaust note coming from the supercharged 5.0-liter V8 is exhilarating. And with a top speed of 186 mph, the car can seriously mess up your hair.
The V8 has plenty of punch down low and pulls strong as the revs climb toward the 6,500-rpm redline. While the previous-generation XKR was noted for the whine emitted from the engine's supercharger, with the XKR-S, engineers opted for a sweet exhaust note. Using a crossover in which exhaust from each cylinder bank is mixed before exiting through an electronically controlled “active” exhaust valve, the car sounds like a Le Mans racer. We found ourselves dipping heavily into the throttle time and time again, just to hear the magnificent sound.
The aluminum chassis is solid, and this convertible model weighs in at just 88 pounds heavier than the coupe, with the mechanism needed to operate the fabric top. The top will open or close in less than 20 seconds. With the top down and the wind deflector in place, at freeway speeds we were easily able to carry on conversations with the passenger.
The XK line is set either to be overhauled following the 2014 model year or be allowed to fade away, mak-ing room for another, as-yet-unannounced line of luxury sports cars.
Until that decision is made, the XKR-S represents the pinnacle for the brand. And if you want one of these rocket ships, you need more than $138,000. You also need your name on the waiting list for cars in 2013. The 25 convertibles available for this year are sold out.
This seems like Jaguar's idea of building a gentleman's race car, something you can flog at a track and then drive home for a nice night on the town, which is popular with enthusiasts. Driving the car, it's easy to understand—great looks and intoxicating power are a potent combination.
ON SALE: Now
BASE PRICE: $138,875
DRIVETRAIN: 5.0-liter, 550-hp, 502-lb-ft supercharged V8; RWD, six-speed automatic
CURB WEIGHT: 3,958 lb
0-60 MPH: 4.2 sec (mfr)
FUEL ECONOMY (EPA): 15 mpg
Gallery :










 
Support : Creating Website | Otomotive Gallery | Gallery Car New
Copyright © 2011. GALLERY CAR NEWS - All Rights Reserved
Template Created by Creating Website Inspired by Sportapolis Shape5.com
Proudly powered by Blogger